Finance operations that run on spreadsheets
Map invoice intake, approvals, reconciliation and month-end close to see where hours, rework and late payments actually come from.
Learn: how many hours a month go to re-keying and chasing approvals?
Services / Automation
We study how your work actually runs, measure where time, errors and delays come from, and score every automation and AI opportunity on value, feasibility and risk. You get a staged, costed roadmap your team can act on, with or without us.
Evidence from real work. Honest scoring. A roadmap you own.
The business case
Teams buy tools or start AI pilots before anyone has measured the process. The result is automation around a workaround, or a demo that never meets real exceptions. An audit first means the money goes where the evidence says it pays back.
Teams buried in manual work, a long list of AI ideas with no clear priority, leadership asking for an automation plan, or past automation projects that did not deliver.
If you already know the exact workflow to automate and have the data and access ready, go straight to a build. We will tell you if an audit would only repeat what you know.
Where this applies
These are example situations, not pre-packaged promises or claims about past results.
Map invoice intake, approvals, reconciliation and month-end close to see where hours, rework and late payments actually come from.
Learn: how many hours a month go to re-keying and chasing approvals?
Trace a lead from enquiry to signed contract to find duplicate entry, missed follow-ups and data that never reaches the CRM.
Learn: how long does a qualified lead wait for first contact?
Classify tickets by type, effort and resolution path to separate what can be automated, what needs better tooling and what needs people.
Learn: what share of tickets follow a known resolution?
Follow hiring, onboarding and offboarding across email, forms and systems to find the steps that delay start dates or leave access open.
Learn: how many days between signed offer and a working laptop?
Find the people acting as integration between ERP, inventory, logistics and reporting tools, and what it costs when they are away.
Learn: which processes stop when one person is on leave?
Turn a long list of AI ideas into a ranked, costed set of opportunities backed by process evidence rather than vendor demos.
Learn: which three opportunities pay back first, and why?
How the audit works
Each process step is reviewed against the same criteria. The steps that score well on value, feasibility and risk move onto a staged roadmap; the rest are simplified, kept with people or parked with a reason.
Real volumes where data exists, the exceptions that break the happy path, a named owner for every process and the human checkpoint each automation needs.
Vendor-driven recommendations, savings figures without assumptions, AI for steps a simple rule would handle, and slide decks nobody can execute.
Discovery
Process documents describe how work should happen. We look at how it does happen, with the people who do it.
Short structured sessions with the people doing the work, plus observation of real cases end to end, including the exceptions.
Read-only review of the tools, exports, inboxes and spreadsheets each process touches, with your approval on what we access.
Counts, cycle times and handling effort taken from real records where they exist, and labelled as estimates where they do not.
The cases that break the happy path, how often they occur and who resolves them. These usually decide what automation is safe.
Assessment
Each candidate is scored on value, feasibility and risk so the comparison is fair and the reasoning is visible.
Hours recovered, errors avoided, faster cycle time or revenue protected, expressed as ranges with stated assumptions.
Data availability, system access, rule clarity and how much variation the step has. Unstructured inputs are not ruled out, but costed honestly.
Financial, legal, privacy and customer impact if the automation is wrong, and the human checkpoint each step needs.
Who has to work differently, the training involved and the dependencies on other teams or vendors.
Choosing the right tool
The roadmap recommends the simplest approach that reliably works for each step.
Remove duplicate approvals, unclear ownership or unnecessary steps before automating them. Automating waste makes it faster waste.
Deterministic workflows, system integrations and existing platform features where inputs are structured and rules are stable.
Document extraction, classification, drafting and agents with scoped permissions where inputs vary but outcomes can be checked.
Steps with high consequence, low volume or real judgement stay with people, supported by better tools and information.
The roadmap
The output is a delivery plan your team can act on, with or without us.
Low-risk changes that can ship within weeks, often configuration or small integrations, to build confidence and free capacity.
The higher-value workflows with their dependencies, data preparation, controls and measurement plans spelled out.
Shared pieces such as integrations, identity, logging and review queues that several automations depend on.
A baseline for each process and the measures that decide whether an automation is kept, adjusted or switched off.
Tools & methods
Discovery relies on people and records more than software. These are the methods and platforms we typically assess, not a list you must adopt.
Current-state maps built with the team, in notation your analysts can maintain.
Volumes and cycle times sampled from real records; process mining tools such as Celonis only where event data supports it.
Matched to complexity, hosting needs and what your team already runs.
Assessed per step for accuracy, cost and data handling requirements.
Integration feasibility checked against real APIs, permissions and rate limits.
Delivered in editable formats your team owns.
Delivery approach
Engineers and analysts work alongside your team. Findings are shared as they emerge, so there are no surprises in the final readout.
Agree the processes in scope, the business goals, the people to involve and the systems we may review.
Output: Scope note, interview plan and access list
Interviews, shadowing and record sampling across the selected processes, including exceptions and workarounds.
Output: Current-state process maps with volumes and pain points
Score every candidate on value, feasibility, risk and change effort, and choose the right approach for each step.
Output: Scored opportunity register with assumptions
Sequence the opportunities into stages with dependencies, effort ranges, controls and measures.
Output: Automation roadmap and business case
Review with stakeholders, test the top assumptions with a small proof where useful, and hand over everything.
Output: Final readout, editable files and a recommended first sprint
A sponsor who can make priority calls, time with the people who do the work, approved access to the relevant records and a finance contact to challenge the business case.
Scope, access and duration are agreed in writing before discovery. Every score in the register shows its reasoning, so you can disagree with it and change it.
What you receive
Everything is delivered in formats your team can update as the business changes.
Each process as it really runs, with owners, systems, volumes, handoffs and exceptions.
Every candidate scored and explained, including the ones we recommend not automating.
Staged plan with dependencies, effort ranges, controls and the measure that proves each stage.
Value and cost ranges with explicit assumptions your finance team can challenge and update.
The audit does not include building the automations. The final readout includes a recommended first sprint if you want to continue.
Related services
The roadmap usually leads into one or more of these.
Questions before starting
Typically two to four weeks for three to five processes, depending on how many teams and systems are involved. We agree the scope and duration before starting.
Read-only access or exports for the processes in scope usually help, but nothing is accessed without your approval. Where access is not possible we work from walkthroughs and samples and label findings accordingly.
No. We give value ranges with the assumptions behind them, and we recommend measuring a baseline so real results can be compared after delivery.
No. The roadmap is yours and is written so your own team or another partner can deliver it.
We recommend approaches and name tools as options. We have no reseller arrangements, and we prefer platforms you already own where they fit.
Then the roadmap says so. Some steps are better fixed by simplifying the process, changing ownership or keeping people in charge with better information.
We minimise what we collect, prefer anonymised samples, follow your access rules and delete working copies at the end of the engagement unless agreed otherwise.
Yes. The final readout includes a recommended first sprint, which we can start immediately if you choose to continue with us.
Start with the evidence
Share the processes that frustrate your team. We will propose a scope, the people to involve and a timeline before any commitment.