Get off end-of-life servers
Move workloads off ageing hardware, unsupported OS versions or a data centre lease that is ending, before the deadline forces a rushed decision.
Learn: are the deadline workloads running on supported infrastructure?
Services / Data & Cloud
We plan migrations from evidence of what you actually run, build the landing zone before anything moves, and migrate in verified waves with rehearsed rollback paths. No big-bang cutovers, no bill surprises, and a platform your team owns.
Waves with evidence. Rollback paths that work. Costs with context.
The business case
Some migrations are overdue: expiring data centre leases, unsupported software, hardware at end of life. Others are fashionable rather than necessary. We start with what the cloud would actually change for you, and we are direct when the answer is 'not much, yet'.
Infrastructure is ageing or unsupported, costs or reliability are unpredictable, a deadline is approaching, or AI and data plans need infrastructure that does not exist yet. Access to systems, logs and the people who run them is essential.
If your infrastructure is healthy and your goal is a new product or an AI feature, product or AI engineering is the better starting point. If the goal is analytics rather than infrastructure, data engineering may serve you better.
Where this applies
These are example situations, not pre-packaged promises or claims about past results.
Move workloads off ageing hardware, unsupported OS versions or a data centre lease that is ending, before the deadline forces a rushed decision.
Learn: are the deadline workloads running on supported infrastructure?
Lift straightforward systems as-is while redesigning only the parts that benefit from cloud-native patterns, so effort lands where it pays back.
Learn: do the redesigned parts actually show cost or reliability gains?
Right-size instances, storage tiers and idle resources so the cloud bill reflects real usage instead of a migration-sized guess.
Learn: does the monthly spend trend down after optimisation, with nothing broken?
Replace backups nobody has restored since last year with tested recovery to a second region, with a recovery time the business has actually agreed.
Learn: does the last restore test meet the agreed recovery window?
Stand up the data platform, GPU access and networking that AI work needs, so model work does not wait on infrastructure.
Learn: can an AI team get compute and data access without a ticket queue?
Move systems with privacy or financial obligations while keeping residency, access control and audit evidence intact, verified before go-live.
Learn: can you show where data lives and who accessed it, on demand?
How a migration runs
Workloads move from the current environment through a migration checkpoint into a landing zone, where applications run on built-as-code infrastructure. Each wave verifies before the next starts, and the rollback path stays rehearsed until the wave is proven.
Discovery from real systems, a landing zone defined in infrastructure code, rehearsed cutovers with measured data integrity, and a documented rollback path for every wave.
Big-bang weekend migrations, rewrites nobody asked for, and lift-and-shift of systems that should have been retired instead.
Assessment & strategy
We inventory what actually runs, what depends on what, and what it costs today. The strategy follows the evidence, including the honest conclusion that some things should stay where they are.
Application inventory, dependency mapping and traffic analysis, so the plan covers the spreadsheet system nobody mentioned until go-live week.
Workloads grouped into migration waves by dependency, risk and business calendar, each wave small enough to verify before the next starts.
What the current estate costs, what the target architecture is expected to cost, and the assumptions behind the estimate, written down.
A deliberate list of what migrates, what gets retired and what stays on-premises, because the cheapest migration is the one that never happens.
Landing zone & architecture
A landing zone is the account structure, networking, identity and guardrails every future workload inherits. Building it first is what separates a cloud platform from a pile of virtual machines.
Environments separated, ownership clear and blast radius contained, so one team's mistake does not take down another's production.
VPCs or VNets, private links to data sources, VPN or ExpressRoute where needed, designed for the traffic your systems actually carry.
Roles, federated sign-on and least-privilege defaults wired in from day one, with break-glass access documented and tested.
Policy and tagging rules enforced automatically, so the estate stays organised as it grows instead of drifting into a naming free-for-all.
Migration execution
Each workload moves through the same discipline: replicate, test against real usage, cut over, and verify. Every wave has a documented rollback path that is actually rehearsed, not theoretical.
Trial migrations into staging with real data volumes and real load patterns, so the production cutover repeats something already proven.
Databases and files moved with checksums, row counts and reconciliation, so data completeness is measured rather than assumed.
Cutovers scheduled around the business, with offline windows and user communication agreed before the maintenance starts.
The old environment kept warm until the new one is verified, with a documented, tested return route if the cutover fails.
Optimisation & operations
Migration is not the finish line. After each wave we right-size, automate operations and make cost and health visible, so the platform improves rather than decays.
Usage measured after migration, instances adjusted to reality and commitments bought where the maths supports them.
Environments defined in Terraform or Pulumi, reviewed and versioned like application code, so the estate is reproducible.
Health, performance and cost dashboards with alerts routed to a named owner, so problems surface before users report them.
Budgets, tagging discipline and a monthly cost review, so spend stays tied to workloads with named owners.
Tools & frameworks
We work across the major clouds and the tooling that keeps migrations repeatable. These are options, not a requirement to use everything on the list.
Provider chosen on your workloads, existing licences, team skills and regional requirements, not on fashion.
Reproducible, reviewed environments across accounts and providers.
Matched to workload type, data volume and acceptable downtime.
Connectivity between cloud, offices and remaining on-premises systems.
Least-privilege access and guardrails enforced by the platform.
Compute shaped per workload; serverless only where usage patterns justify it.
Health, performance and spend visible with alerts to named owners.
Managed services and tiered storage chosen on access patterns and cost.
Platform choice depends on your workloads, existing licences, team skills and data residency requirements. We recommend after the assessment, not before it.
Delivery approach
You work with engineers inside the delivery process. Every wave is visible, verified and approved before the next one starts.
Inventory applications, dependencies, data and costs; classify workloads and agree what migrates, what stays and what gets retired.
Output: Discovery report, dependency map, wave plan and cost baseline.
Architect the account structure, networking, identity and guardrails, and validate the design against the first wave's requirements.
Output: Landing zone design and architecture decision records.
Build the landing zone as code, then migrate a low-risk pilot workload end to end, proving the process before scaling it.
Output: Running landing zone and a verified pilot migration.
Move workloads in planned waves with rehearsed cutovers, integrity checks and rollback paths, verifying each wave before the next.
Output: Migrated workloads with cutover and verification evidence per wave.
Right-size, automate operations, set up cost governance and transfer ownership with documentation and pairing.
Output: Optimised estate, runbooks and a team that runs the platform.
A decision-maker, access to systems and logs, the people who know what runs where, and whoever owns the maintenance windows and the budget. For regulated workloads, bring compliance stakeholders into scoping early.
The wave plan, expected downtime, cost assumptions and rollback paths are written down and approved before any workload moves. If discovery changes the plan, the change is agreed with you first.
Handover & ownership
Everything lives in your repositories and cloud accounts from day one. Handover includes the architecture rationale and the operational practices, so the platform stays healthy after we leave.
Accounts, networking and environments defined in versioned infrastructure code your engineers can read, review and extend.
Every wave has a cutover record: what moved, how it was tested, what the rollback plan was and what verification showed.
A running bill tied to workloads and owners, with the assumptions behind it, so future budget conversations start from facts.
Runbooks, alert routing and monitoring your team operates, with knowledge transferred during the work rather than at the end.
Delivery does not include unlimited maintenance or a service-level commitment. We can agree ongoing cloud operations support, or hand over fully to your own team.
Related engineering services
Cloud work often connects to data platforms, modernisation or dedicated engineering capacity.
Questions before starting
Sometimes no, or not everything. We assess what you run, what it costs and what constraints you have, and we are direct when staying on-premises, going hybrid or retiring systems is the better answer. A migration that solves no problem is just risk with a budget.
Small estates with a handful of servers can move in weeks. Larger estates with interdependent systems, data migrations and compliance requirements run in waves over months, with production value delivered along the way rather than at a single big-bang cutover.
Some workloads accept near-zero downtime with replication and staged cutovers; others need a short maintenance window, usually minutes to a few hours. We state the expected downtime per workload in the wave plan, and you approve each window before it happens.
Every wave has a documented and rehearsed rollback path, and the old environment stays available until the new one is verified under real usage. If a cutover fails its checks, we go back, fix and retry rather than debugging in production.
We set a cost baseline before migrating, right-size after each wave, and put budgets, tagging and alerts in place so spend maps to named workloads. The first bill after a migration is often higher than the steady state; we plan for that and tell you what normal looks like.
Yes, with residency, encryption, access control and audit evidence designed into the landing zone and verified before each wave moves regulated workloads. We work within your compliance obligations and recommend qualified advisers where legal interpretation is needed.
Usually not all of them, and often not at all. We rehost what works fine as-is, and reserve re-platforming or re-architecting for systems where the change pays for itself in cost, reliability or capability.
Your team owns the infrastructure code, the runbooks, the monitoring and the cost governance. We pair with your engineers throughout the waves so knowledge transfers with the work, and we can stay available for later phases or reviews if useful.
Start with the question
Share what runs today, what is forcing the change, and any deadlines. We will agree a practical first wave.